January 11 agreement

Discussion held on Wednesday 11th January with Julian, Karin, Sarah, Allan, Tom & Phil between 7-8pm at 3d.

Different understandings were expressed about why the current disconnect exists between the Sussex Heights Board and the Sussex Heights Residents Association.

These included:

  • Problems perceived about the web-site – its aims, use, range and attitudes expressed on the site.
  • Problems re communication – where correspondence is ignored and discussion refused on critical and essential practical issues re the building.
  • The issue that the web was world-wide rather than internal ( intranet?)
  • The personalizing of criticism
  • The understanding of “passing off” Is there a confusion? Is the underlying problem really the content on the web-site rather than the legal business definition of passing off.

An agreement was made between all participants that the way forward is:

  1. Cease litigation as from now
  2. S.H. Board pay their own costs
  3. S.H. Residents Association pay their own costs
  4. S.H. Residents Association website to be named Sussex Heights Residents Association .org
  5. S.H.R.A.org will remove all content that is found to be offensive.
  6. S.H.R.A. will remove all Official Board documents.
  7. S.H. Board will remove all content that is found to be personally offensive.
  8. All personal names will be removed from both sites.
  9. Both sites discussion areas will be password protected
  10. Both sites will be open to site monitoring
  11. Participants agreed to signing the agreement in order to formalise it.

Board Representatives will take the proposed agreement to the full Board meeting on January 17th

Further discussions are needed for specific areas of concern e.g. water/pumps, the roof, general works etc

Valerie Phillips (Phil)

Posted in Legal nonsense | 2 Comments

Little Planet Street View | CreativeJS

This is a very clever trick (or as they used to say back in the day, a “mash-up”) using Google Maps Street View and WebGL. It uses stereographic projection and WebGL fragment shaders (GLSL) to manipulate the typical panoramic Street View and turn it into a self-contained “little planet”.

via Little Planet Street View | CreativeJS.

Posted in noticeboard | Leave a comment

BBA certified durability: 30 years

9.1 The aluminium components of the system will perform effectively, without maintenance, for a period of 30 years in rural or suburban surroundings, or 20 years in severe industrial surroundings(1).
(1) Excluding the immediate vicinity of, and downwind from chemical plants, copper foundries, cement works and other factories which produce contaminants particularly corrosive to aluminium.

via http://www.alifabs.com/building-products/Building_Products_BBA_Certificate.pdf

Posted in maintenance | Leave a comment

Intellectual Property Office – Passing off unregistered trade marks

To be successful in a passing off action, you must prove that:

  1. the mark is yours
  2. you have built up a reputation in the mark
  3. you have been harmed in some way by the other person’s use of the mark

It can be very difficult, and as a result, expensive to prove a passing off action.

If you register your mark, it is easier to take legal action. This allows you to take legal action against infringement of your trade mark, rather than using passing off.

via Intellectual Property Office – Passing off unregistered trade marks.

Posted in Legal nonsense | Leave a comment

Admissible evidence – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Admissible evidence, in a court of law, is any testimonial, documentary, or tangible evidence that may be introduced to a factfinder—usually a judge or jury—in order to establish or to bolster a point put forth by a party to the proceeding. In order for evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant, without being prejudicial, and it must have some indicia of reliability.

via Admissible evidence – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Posted in Legal nonsense | Leave a comment

Passing off – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is insufficient to simply show likelihood/actual deception and/or confusion. Ultimately, the Court must use common sense in determining the case, based on evidence and judicial discretion, and not witnesses.

via Passing off – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This is Tilt Shift Brighton on Vimeo

This is Brighton on Vimeo on Vimeo

via This is Brighton on Vimeo.

Posted in peregrine falcons | Leave a comment

New Neighbours Opening Theme – YouTube

New Neighbours Opening Theme

via New Neighbours Opening Theme – YouTube.

Posted in noticeboard | Leave a comment

Sussex Heights witness to Porsche crash on Hove Lawns

Yann “found this morning on the Web, on a non-Brighton related website…”:

Posted in noticeboard | Leave a comment

Protected: The £20k Question

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Posted in Legal nonsense | Enter your password to view comments.